Engine size and buying advice - mobilvetta top driver 52 - Motorhome Forums, Motorhome Discussion, Motorhome Chat

User Tag List

LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 6 (permalink) Old 22-11-2014, 08:32 Thread Starter
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Engine size and buying advice - mobilvetta top driver 52

Hi everyone, I'm considering buying my first motorhome and would like some advice please.
The mobilvetta meets my criteria of compact size, four berth including four seat belts and within buget.

I have two main questions.

In 2000 Fiat supplied the top driver with three engine sizes to chose 1.9, 2.5 and 2.8. From this range which is the more desirable or reliable?

I'm viewing a mobivetta soon is there anything I should check / know issues with this model.

Thanks for any help.
levidated is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 6 (permalink) Old 22-11-2014, 09:02
Senior Member
bognormike's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sunny Bognor
My Motorhome: Neismann & Bischoff Arto 66F
Posts: 18,488
Thanks: 91
Thanked 91 Times in 78 Posts
Personal Aire
engine-wise, the 1.9TD would be sufficient for the smaller vans, I had the peugeot version in my first van (an autocruise starfire). I had a 2.5TD in my 1999 Pilote Galaxy (3850kg) and it was a bit sluggish on hills etc, but was fine for cruising.

I think the 2.8td replaced the 2.5 version

As far as I know, the only motorhoming Oxford United supporter in Bognor.

I don't feed trolls!
bognormike is offline  
post #3 of 6 (permalink) Old 22-11-2014, 09:31
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,019
Thanks: 80
Thanked 98 Times in 93 Posts
As with any 2nd hand camper of this type of construction get a full damp check,

Check underneath exposed unprotected timber Where the wall timber frame joins the floor along both sides and across the rear

A friend had a driver 52 with the 2.8 engine from new it was the nearest thing to driving a sports car

I think most driver 52's came with the 1.9engine

The 1.9 turbo would be fine in a camper this small
trek is online now  
post #4 of 6 (permalink) Old 22-11-2014, 10:23
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Costa Blanca North, Spain.
My Motorhome: 2001 Benimar 6000sl on Ducato 2.8JTD
Posts: 1,254
Thanks: 4
Thanked 39 Times in 31 Posts
The old 2.5TD was the one which Fiat had been fitting into vans for the previous ten(?) years or so. From memory I thought they finally stopped fitting it to new vans in 1999.
Solid old lump to chug around with, but quite a lot of turbo problems with them nowadays, given their age.

The 2.8JTD that replaced the 2.5TD is/was a much better engine.
A lot more power, a lot more torque and comparatively better economy too.
My strong vote would be to go for the 2.8JTD engine. Many more spares around still too.

In all cases take it for a good long test drive, and work the gearbox a lot to ensure no jumping-out of 5th gear problems.
Make sure you get the thing up into top (5th) many times and then put your foot hard down to check for clutch slip too......many people have put engine oil that is too modern/thin into these old lumps (stick to 20/50 mineral oil and you'll be fine), and that causes the crankshaft oil seals to leak, which can then contaminate the clutch plates. Expensive.

Whatever you end up buying, make changing the gear box oil your first priority. On many such vans it's never ever been changed, and that can cause big gearbox failure issues.
TheNomad is offline  
post #5 of 6 (permalink) Old 22-11-2014, 10:46
Senior Member
peejay's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Narfook
My Motorhome: Hymer B504 on Ducato 2.8jtd
Posts: 11,399
Thanks: 82
Thanked 263 Times in 181 Posts
Personal Aire

I had a 2000 Top Driver 52 from new (X635WRB, wonder if its still about?).

Mine was on the 2.8idtd and went like poo off the proverbial although as mentioned the 1.9 obviously wasn't as quick but would be adequate for such a small van. I didn't realise they did one with the 2.5 engine, must have been some of the very first ones.

The layout was great for us with one of the best kitchen layouts ever and compact dimensions that won us over.

Now the bad bits

About 18 months from new damp appeared in the rear corner by the locker door and all along the rear end of the floor and needed extensive warranty repairs to sort out.
Unfortunately about 6months later the damp was back again so we got a favourable trade in deal with another van from the same dealer and got rid.

Get a proper damp check and if its there - walk away.

Great van and we really liked it apart from the damp obviously. If it hadn't had that problem we would have kept it much longer.

The electric step (Project 2000) was another known problem for failing on these vans although ours was ok.

Check the foam in the dinette seating and the overcab bed, it was cheap and known to sag making it uncomfortable to sit and sleep on after a while.

All in all, a great little van at a great new price, but let down a bit (on ours) by dubious build quality, they cut corners to get that price imo, they sold very well though.

I think Knaus did one with a similar layout and compact length around that time if you can find one of them.

peejay is offline  
post #6 of 6 (permalink) Old 23-11-2014, 13:45
Senior Member
jo662's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Cambridgeshire
My Motorhome: Kontiki 669
Posts: 3,012
Thanks: 390
Thanked 125 Times in 123 Posts
Our first motorhome was a Mobilvetta top driver 52,it had the 1.9 diesel engine,which i found ok if not abit under powered.We liked this motorhome very much,but found it a little small.
The only thing wrong with ours was a damp smell in the rear locker,but no signs of any damp apart from the smell.And the gearbox had a tight to engage 2nd gear.
Was an ideal introduction into the world of motorhoming for us.
jo662 is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Motorhome Forums, Motorhome Discussion, Motorhome Chat forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome